Comments on: Anath vs Aelnathan; Amazon ID Smackdown II–Prelude.

By: Anath vs. Aelnathan part 4 » The Antichristian Phenomenon

Anath vs. Aelnathan part 4 » The Antichristian Phenomenon — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 19:14:07 +0000

[...] you’re new to this series, here’s The Prelude, Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3. Anath said: I’m not too frustrated, I’m having a grand [...]

By: Anath vs. Aelnathan Part 3 » The Antichristian Phenomenon

Anath vs. Aelnathan Part 3 » The Antichristian Phenomenon — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 22:54:36 +0000

[...] here. The content I am posting starts on page 3. If you’re new to this series, here’s The Prelude, Part 1, and Part 2. >>I see your point on “decreasing genetic diversity”. Perhaps my [...]

By: Anath vs. Aelnathan Part 2 » The Antichristian Phenomenon

Anath vs. Aelnathan Part 2 » The Antichristian Phenomenon — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:29:30 +0000

[...] you’re new to this series, here’s The Prelude and Part [...]

By: Anath vs. Aelnathan Part 1 » The Antichristian Phenomenon

Anath vs. Aelnathan Part 1 » The Antichristian Phenomenon — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 12:53:42 +0000

[...] will be much shorter than the Prelude since we no longer have to catch [...]

By: LeaT

LeaT — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 19:24:45 +0000

I think the problem with supporters of ID and alike is that they cannot accept that morals could potentially be biologically evolved or be superficially created by mankind. It should preferrebly be objective by some creator, and with that in mind, it's much easier for them to push their ethics on people because "it's all objective".

By: Anath

Anath — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 05:22:33 +0000

Exactly, I don't get the point. The Theory of Evolution="Darwinism"=Nazis=Eugenics=evuls "argument" to invalidate evolution is the SAME as saying crusades and the effects of various religions invalidates the religion, or at the very least make it less savory/moral, and we all know how much the religious HATE that… or its the similar to saying that because we can use theories in physics and the theory of gravity to drop bombs those ideas and laws are somehow guilty by association.

Proves nothing, waste of time, invalid argument. Fortunately it didn't come up again.

By: Waldheri

Waldheri — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 14:11:46 +0000

I always wonder about the comment on Hitler concerning "Darwinian ethics" – Hitler shouldn't have worried if he really adhered to the "Darwinian model", because it predicts weaker species will eventually lose their finger in the gene pie anyway, due to natural selection of the stronger / better adapted individuals.

Furthermore, accepting that evolution is true does not mean you think it is a good system to derive ethics from – or anything else, like economic polities, actually. A "neuroeconomist" (whatever the fuck that's supposed to mean) recently wrote an article titled "If you accept evolution, you must oppose over-regulation of the economy". I wrote a similar comment there (second, titled "Bullshit")