First of all, Happy/Merry whatever-holiday-you-celebrate. Hopefully everyone is enjoying the day off work and school and putting on a few pounds with tasty cookies.
Full article below the jump:
On another note, I have been thinking a lot in the past few days about this topic, after a rather heated conversation with my dad on our drive from the airport. As he still doesn’t “officially” know about my stance on the whole “God Question”, he saw no problems complaining to me about a display put up at a state courthouse by the Freedom From Religion Foundation, while taking the Bill ORLY point of view that such displays were offensive and should not be displayed at Christmastime. Naturally, I pressed him on the issue, receiving the all-too-predictable response that “Atheists need to realize they live in a Christian Culture and Christmas is a Christian Holiday”, “Atheists would get more respect if they weren’t shoving their beliefs onto others”, and so on. Yes, yes, we’re all going to go crawl into a hole, hold our tongue and plug our ears for the holiday, and of course–all year by extension! Then we’ll certainly get the support we need to stand our ground politically, after all, “the reason gay marriage is being so strongly opposed in some states is because they’re so loud about it.” (This is an actual quote from the conversation…)
Additionally, tonight I performed my yearly duty and attended Christmas Eve Mass with my parents. No blow by blow account this year, but the homily was worth mentioning. The priest, who I did not recognize, gave the yearly guilt trip, but put a frustrating spin on the whole affair. Broken down to its core elements, he railed against “taking Christ out of Christmas”, which was quite expected, but in the process made some quite illogical and even insulting leaps. First, he went through a series of “Christmas is supposed to be about X, if you believe Y”, where X was some warm/fuzzy or fundamentally secular message (Santa, family, etc), and Y was a series of sources (the media, advertisements, stories, songs, etc). Then, he went through a sequence of devaluing the X messages, such as eroding the message about families being together by making statements about dysfunctional families, awkward gatherings, jealousy, and so on, or gifts/Santa with rampant commercialism. If we end here and want to be cynical and pessimistic Scrooges, this is not an unreasonable view. After all, I’m sure everyone can relate to awkward family gatherings and disgust over the transition of a domestic holiday into a commercial one. The core of the Christmas experience is not always the shiny package under the tree, but it can be quite different and even dark when opened.
However, this is not where it ended. He continued by inserting the expected religious message, where we accept the baby in the manger (“His arms are open, will yours be?”), then went the extra step by asserting that if we did NOT embrace the Christian side of Christmas we would be stuck with the devalued, pessimistic side of all the X messages. This is implied as opposing the idea that if we do accept Christ’s half of Christmas we’ll be blessed with the optimistic sides of the X messages? I see what you did there, way to set up a false dichotomy. The train of logic here has not simply broken down, it’s become a failtrain.
Now, I was poking around the internet tonight, reading some articles about the new Atheist Guide to Christmas book to lift my spirits from over an hour of a bizarre, illogical attempted guilt trip when I stumbled across this article: “Merry Christmas vs. Happy Holiday” (linked from “An Atheist’s Defense of Christmas”)
This ties in quite well with the above two problems. Both my father and the priest, representatives of a much larger population, want Christmas to remain a holiday with a primarily religious focus, despite rampant commercialism and increased secularization. Both claim that by keeping “Christ in Christmas”–partly by promotion of Christian symbology and terminology, partly by suppression of alternative views–all the “true meanings” will shine through, everyone will be happy, and family gatherings will be warm and fuzzy and full of love (if you follow the priest’s twisted logic, that is). Maybe that is true, maybe it isn’t, but following Justin Bills here, I think the real question we need to be asking is slightly different. He says:
But I was faced with a stark question in this debate. “Is saying ‘Merry Christmas’ really putting Christ back in Christmas?”
In a word: NO. And we can extend that, not only will Christian terminology not reclaim your holiday, but suppressing the nontheist voice won’t either, or even attempting to follow the fail-logic of the priest’s sermon. Justin Bills understands this, and answers his own question quite well:
As a Christian, I understand that Christmas is a beautiful celebration of God sending His Son to for the salvation of all. I believe it is “Good news” as the angels put it. I want everyone to know about the “good news”. But I also recognize that for some this “good news” doesn’t come off as “good” at all. It’s a reminder that Christians at times don’t look anything like Jesus. “Merry Christmas” can be another reminder of the history of pain and oppression Christians have put people through.
That’s right, Justin. The Jesus story is not “good news” to everyone, and frequently Christians look nothing like Jesus, and shame his story with their bigotry. And for nontheists–as well as other religions currently oppressed by Christianity–it is not just a reminder of the past, but of the present. Every time we see a religious representation of Christmas or have to listen to Christians use this opportunity to lash out against those who don’t think like they do, nontheists are painfully reminded that we are still a marginal minority, still struggling to be heard.
Christmas may have religious roots, but stronger than those religious roots are the cultural underpinnings, which even predate the religious connotations. There is no reason nontheists can’t celebrate a cultural holiday–just as there is no reason theists can’t steal holidays from other cultures and mold them to fit their own ends (Just don’t expect us to honor them as such!). Culture is fluid, it grows and adapts. NOTHING will reclaim this holiday to be a purely religious holy day. Theists can shout Merry Christmas until they’re blue in the face, vandalize FFRF signs, set up elaborate manger scenes, or claim the shifting terminology is part of a secular progressive agenda, but one fact remains. Culture has already moved on, and Christmas has become a holiday for everyone, not just Christians.
Time to accept this fact and move on, striving for the optimistic X messages. Despite what many religious might have you believe, you can realize these values without buying into the Jesus-half of Christmas, just try it. After all…
I’m having a Happy Holiday, and I hope you are too.
Welcome! If you're new here, before you open your mail program to fire up a nasty email, you may want to first read our FAQ to avoid being ignored. If you like the content, we hope you will to subscribe to our RSS feed. Stay open minded!
If you don't like the content of this website on the other hand, kindly fuck off.
The Antichristian Phenomenon



December 25th, 2009 at 8:41 am - Edit
Indeed, I often think that we should put "Christ" back in "Christians" before we talk about anything else. Like you said: Christmas has become a holiday for all; and I don't care what you call it. Is it a late celebration of the winter solstice, or Sol Invictus, or Saturnalia, or or Yuletide, or plain simple "family time". The Atheist Experience talked a lot about the "Reason for the Season" (#636) and Matt Dillahunty summarized that the fun parts of Christmas are either pagan or secular; if it was only a celebration of the incarnation of Jesus it would be as lame as Ash Wednesday.
I'm fine with people doing their best to remind people of the Christian incarnation of this holiday, but please let everyone celebrate it in the way they see fit.
December 25th, 2009 at 10:51 am - Edit
Where is "Christ" really at in Christmas anyway? It is highly unlikely that it is the time of year of the birth of Jesus, Santa has nothing to do with Jesus, Yule has nothing to do with it, a "Christmas tree" is a tradition that also has nothing to do with Jesus… So where exactly would he fit into Christmas?
Christmas to this atheist is simple; it a called Christmas because it is easier than terming it something else, it is a time that my family gives gifts to each other in to show we care, and it is a time where annoying each other with extra time spent together as we are all home for an extended period of time.
Honestly anyone that says we need to put the "Christ" back into Christmas doesn't understand the history of the celebration, and doesn't recognize that it is, was, and always will be a pagan holiday. If they chose to set that day to recognize Jesus, good for them, but don’t tell me that it is the “right” way. After all it wasn’t even their holiday to begin with, and they “stole” the traditions of others…
*Sigh at the Christian nation…
December 26th, 2009 at 4:04 am - Edit
I agree entirely!
I also think if it were nothing but the celebration of the incarnation of Jesus there would be no problem, just as there's really no problem with any non-Christan wanting to celebrate Ash Wednesday.
December 26th, 2009 at 6:58 am - Edit
"Honestly anyone that says we need to put the "Christ" back into Christmas doesn't understand the history of the celebration, and doesn't recognize that it is, was, and always will be a pagan holiday."
I am with you but it pains me to read the word "pagan". This is how the Christians describe us – in lowercase right there with the "animals". Request you to use "Pagans" instead. A very happy Winter Solstice to you.
December 28th, 2009 at 11:38 am - Edit
Just start referring to them as christians in lower case and it will be all fine and dandy! In fact, in Sweden we don't capitalize any religious nouns, it's all lower case, so kristen (Christian), kristendomen (Christianity), islam (Islam), muslim (Muslim) and hedning (Pagan). I don't refer to god in upper case either, and there are people who actually are put off by this it seems. I do find it silly that in Sweden we refer the Christian god with a capital G, but the other gods not. I think the context very well states which gods we are referring to either way, and lower and upper case letters don't exist in verbal language.
December 31st, 2009 at 10:15 pm - Edit
hehe… Christmas isn't even a holiday for Christians… It's a holiday for pagans; but anyway, Christians took the day aboard and made it a public holiday… so that's fine with me.
March 16th, 2010 at 10:19 am - Edit
Hi, great, this is top notch stuff, keep up the good work.Cheers