The above (title) is something I decided just now, after watching this video. Specifically, the part that made me take this decision is the 4th chapter which begins on the 58th minute.

Apparently, Quran itself instructs its followers to lie and deceive in the name of promoting Islam. Sure, Muslims will tell you that Islam denounces lies but it is the words of their Prophet himself that specifically allows a member of his cohort to lie in order to slay one of his enemies. and this is of course just one example of the Quran promoting deceit.

I honestly had no idea of this to tell the truth. I could not imagine that religion itself practically teaches people to lie if their purpose is to promote the cause of Islam.

This actually explains quite a lot.

It explains how Muslims can promote themselves as peaceful or whatever but when the concentration of Muslims actually becomes considerate in any given country, violence is certain to occur. They are lying. They are either presenting a facade of a peaceful citizen or they are not aware of what Islam really is about. Unfortunately, given the specific instructions in their holy book, I cannot accept that only the second type exists.

I have thus decided not to trust any Muslim again. This is a radical statement to make but I feel that I am left with no other choice. Especially from a religion, you are supposed to receive correct values that will make you a member of society. When a religion itself instructs you to be a liar and you fail to denounce this religion, then I am left with no other choice but to label you as a liar and take the appropriate social actions people should take against any liar.

Sure, a Mulsim might say that he does not follow that part of the Quran’s teachings but how do I then know that he is not lying once more in order to appease me until he has enough power over me so as not to care if I consider him a deceiver anymore?

When you own beliefs instruct you to become a liar, then the only way to regain my trust if to denounce these beliefs. Anything less can easily be faked.

Ah, and do yourself a favour and watch the video in its entirety and of course specifically the fourth chapter.

UPDATE: In case you can’t be bothered to see the video, at least read this

Welcome! If you're new here, before you open your mail program to fire up a nasty email, you may want to first read our FAQ to avoid being ignored. If you like the content, we hope you will to subscribe to our RSS feed. Stay open minded!
If you don't like the content of this website on the other hand, kindly fuck off.

45 Responses to “Why I have decided never to trust a Muslim again.”
  1. Anita says:

    Just saw the movie and yes it struck me too. It should be seen by everybody. The evil in this religion is alarmous but learning the fact that Muslims are tought to lie is the limit for me. The danger is far more present than most of us know or even can imagine.

  2. Chicken Girl says:

    Devil’s Advocate: How is their being taught to lie any worse than Christbots “lying for Jesus”?

    Personally, what bothers me is the violence and the complete and utter intolerance of criticism of any kind — valid or otherwise.

  3. Db0 says:

    Devil’s Advocate: How is their being taught to lie any worse than Christbots “lying for Jesus”?

    The difference in this case is that other Christians have a leg to stand on and criticize the liars as can we point them how they are not following the teachings of their own religion. Muslims cannot honestly criticize people lying for Islam since it’s their own religion that commands it.

    Generally it’s harder for someone to do something (lie in this case) when his religion opposes it. It will take more mental gymnastics to explain it to themselves. This is not true when your own religion urges you to do it.

  4. RJ says:

    “Apparently, Quran itself instructs its followers to lie and deceive in the name of promoting Islam. Sure, Muslims will tell you that Islam denounces lies but it is the words of their Prophet himself that specifically allows a member of his cohort to lie in order to slay one of his enemies. and this is of course just one example of the Quran promoting deceit.”

    If you can please provide chapter and verse from the Quran. This would be very useful information. Just saying it is there is a half measure we need evidence.

  5. Chicken Girl says:

    I take your point, but given how self-contradictory the Bible is, I bet you could find at least one verse (maybe more) that could be stretched or twisted or otherwise manipulated to support “lying for Jesus”. I also bet a lot of liberal/moderate Muslims would say that the verse telling Muslims to lie has been stretched or manipulated to say that.

    That being said, I believe Muslims (and Christians) ought to go one step further than simply denouncing these verses and just cut them out altogether. They serve no purpose except to cause conflicts and repression and violence.

  6. Db0 says:

    RJ Did you see the video at the time I mentioned? It has the relevant chapters noted there

  7. Minion4Hire says:

    For those link-shy, there’s approx. 1.2 billion (with a B) muslims and 1.1 billion catholics. There are more total christians (although according to the vatican, non-catholics aren’t true christians) worldwide, but muslims now comprise the single largest religious denomination in the world. Hard to say how “hardcore” any of these muslims are (the few muslims I’ve known have been rather extreme) but even if only a small percentage approve of taqiyya or kitman that’s far too many. It’s hard to say whether christians are really any better when most seem to do as they please and work out their sins with semantics later, but a sort of scriptural loophole could certainly allow for far more rationalized premeditation, whether of lie or deed.

  8. db0 says:

    I didn't know about the Jewish commandment. If you find a referrence I'd be interested but in any case, the Jews cannot convert others outside of family bonds to their religion so I think their memetic advantage is really small, as can be seen by their worldwide numbers.

    The problem with the Muslims who follow the Hadiths is that this is explicitly endorsed, as opposed to the Christians who must go against the commandments.

  9. lu pikir la seniri says:

    if you dont really understand it, its best to just keep quite. dont judge a religion because of its people, but judge it by doing the research on the
    religion itself. i was quite amuse by people who tend to get easily inluence by todays media or cheap gossips like this.
    dont include any url but provide evidence from the quran it self and which verse.

  10. lu pikir la seniri says:

    besides, the quran has NEVER been modified, changed, edited, or comes in several new edition,.for instance like the…..
    (lets leave that for u to think)
    and what is more, it has never been done that way by any human being..i mean…its not a magazine that u can
    easily add or erase anything u want or dislike to suits with todays life.then it will just give us the image of how
    cheap that thing will be .right? i mean..hello??? a bible for a religion must be perfect right? whats this modifiying,,editing thing!??!huh
    thats amusing…dont u think? eniway..
    the Quran,it is THE SAME ORIGINAL holy quran and still fresh till today. wonder why? u think by urself..even the world changes and turn more modernize,
    the quran is still the original one serve as the guidance for all muslims..and will stay that way forever..

  11. lu pikir la seniri says:

    but the sad fact is,it is the muslims today (i meant the 50/50 muslims, why
    50 50 because these are the people that do not practice Islam as a whole or probably just faking to be one.)
    tend to not reflect of what a true muslim
    should be which is why many non-muslims tend to misunderstood thinking perhaps it is wat being taught in Islam where by right is not.
    but still…even if i give the most hardcore evidence of the right truth about islam, but if ur mindset has already set
    a negative thoughts on it, wat can i say eh..so..its best if u search the answer yourself..but make sure it is original qualified truth.
    anyway…diferent pipol have different views, we all have brains, what makes it different is the way we generate our brain to think.

  12. lu pikir la seniri says:

    and how we think~

    tq

  13. Anath says:

    OK I'll play along … and what should a "true Muslim" be?

    Please try and respond in English next time, so that we can all understand what you are trying to say.

  14. TheEdgecrusher says:

    hahahahaha…
    yeah, that's what they say about the bible too…
    and what proof do you have for that ? let me give you a hint: none !

    anyway, in regarding this article, I have to say that it is a little unfair to muslims in general…
    has anyone ever read the jewish talmud ? that what you'd call a book full of hatred and dislike for anyone not of their kind.

  15. lu pikir la seniri says:

    oops…sorry..i taught i did say it in english..maybe its in broken english..forgive me..
    anyway…humans are not perfect..and whats more of the increase amount of varieties of negative
    influences today in our world..(it will be greater influences for the muSLim for have rules need to be follow)
    and despite this, for certain muslims, that their 'IMAN' are a bit shaky…it is wen they tend to commit such sins
    im not really well versed but i will try to tell what i know
    a true muslims are people that stays in the right path of what the religion had taught them
    to do and what not to do.and this is based on the holy Quran and 'sunnah'
    yes..u may commit sins either purposely or accidently
    if so..that will be between u n God in gaining his forgiveness

  16. jorrizza says:

    I'm afraid you've been misguided, my friend. Islam teaches next to peace, wellbeing and kindness things like inequality and religious violence. I bet I don't have to quote the verses, you've read the Quran more than I have. Please stop showing off your self deceit and read the Quran again, without your Imam looking over your shoulder.

  17. lu pikir la seniri says:

    i will try to make short and precise
    'IMAN' (pronounce as ee-man) here refers to the belief in every muslim that Allah exists and everything that He says is true
    thus..it is compulsory for every Muslims to hold on to this 'IMAN'
    once if they commit of going out from being a Muslim..they will be non-Muslim
    and their IMAN has gone.
    in short, a true Muslims are those who stays on taking care of their IMAN and resembles what the religion taught them todo
    but it doesnt mean that muslims who sometimes commit sins are labelled as NOT A TRUE musLim
    this is because as long as they have their IMAN, they are still a Muslim
    it is just that, sometimes,i must agree that muslims may do something that does not at all
    resemble what Islam has taught them to do
    'just because a drop of ink in a glass of water, the whole water is contimated' (i hope u got the meaning)
    which is why, its not fair to just judge the religion,by only seeing it on the surface
    u have to dig into it to find the root of the problem
    like i said, im not yet well versed of Islam and im still learning
    any lack of info i apologize

  18. LeaT says:

    Jorrizza, I am not entirely sure but I might believe this is a troll :) I base this on the assumption that one the one hand, he cannot spell anything properly but on the other hand, he does have some words being quite eloquent for someone who has very poor English skills and those words he actually for some reason spell correct. Maybe it's just me but I wouldn't associate someone who can actually spell and use words such as "varieties", grammar forms such as "despite this, for certain muslims" (relative clause, a lot of people don't know how to use them properly) etc as somehow actually having a poor language unless something is very fake about it. Whether you are a troll or not though lu likir la semiri remains unknown, but i have a feeling you are here only to gain some sort of reaction.

  19. jorrizza says:

    Oh, no, I'm not convinced yet. Trolls retaliate, this one keeps holding on to the faith. I think our visitor is a genuine Muslim, who is welcome imho.

  20. lu pikir la seniri says:

    yes..true..the article is unfair..which is why i was keen to reply it in the first place
    but then again..
    people have their own opinions and what they believe in..
    i respect that
    its just that
    sometimes wen someone tends to questions on what u believe in you will feel protective about it
    because i beleive in it, thats why i want to stand up for it..and im sure u r too
    and human beings always have question for every doubt they encounter
    people will be wondering if God exists..
    they will be wondering if there is God then how does he looks like
    People will be wondering why does we come into this world..
    they will be wondering if we have goals to fulfill
    people will also be wondering what causes certain cause
    ..and what about communication between God and human
    wondering about certain certainty..
    they will be wondering so many things in the world..
    dont u wonder?

  21. jorrizza says:

    There's a difference between a religion and what people are telling you about it. If you read the Quran, you'll notice there's nothing like a "true Muslim". Unbelievers are either forgiven or killed, depending on the verse you're reading. Even by fulfilling Islam and Iman, you're still not there yet. You'll have to live by the faith, too. I believe that's called Ahsan, forgive me if I'm wrong. Anyway, what I'm getting at is that we do know about your religion, but we're pointing out flaws and weaknesses in the Islamic belief system. If you want to convince people of your ideas, argue against the points brought forward by the article(s).

  22. lu pikir la seniri says:

    this is the problem..
    people tend to associate Islam with such things
    without really understands it
    why?
    it is because people tend to read the Quran as just a matter of reading
    they dont go beyond of what actually meant by the words
    which is why this will lead to misintrepretation
    a person needs to read between the line of the Quran
    yes, i may read Quran more than u do
    which is why i understand and know the truth about it and strongly oppose your points

    regarding your says that islam is an inequality and religious violence
    please kindly quote the verses and from what chapter.
    tq.

    yes..like i have mentioned before…i am not yet well versed, any
    lack ing of information i apologized.
    but i am just sharing my point of view and what i understood
    and besides, this is a forum, and you are welcome to discuss right?

  23. lu pikir la seniri says:

    im sorry of my poor level of english..
    i do admit my compentancy in english is kinda bad
    but i think there are some people who understood it
    if not, there would not be any critics on what ive posted..aren't they?
    nah..im not into cheap publicity here
    im just interested to know what others think and their opinion
    and beside i just came about of posting some of my thoughts on the article the other day
    and didnt expect any reply in return
    nothing harm from this unknown 'troll'.. ~~,
    ..btw thanks for reminding me about the language tho
    ill try to improve it

  24. db0 says:

    Who are you to say that the true meaning of the Quran is in between the words? That sounds like a compromise you made in order to avoid all the nasty stuff it has to say and basically keep only the easy ones and those that fit in your own morality. Most fundamentalist Muslims would disagree with you on this (and possibly kill you).

    But yes, it's all a matter of interpretation and just because you've interpreted it one way, does not mean that this interpretation is correct. That is why the Quran and the Bible are like the big books of multiple choice. If you interpret them right, you'll find them instructing you to do anything, which is, what you wanted to do all along anyway

  25. db0 says:

    Lu, I would first ask you not to use shortcuts like "u" instead of "you" on a comment box. There's no lack of space or time and it just makes you look like a 13 year old because it's so annoying to read. Now…

    u have to dig into it to find the root of the problem

    The root of the problem in Islam, like all other religions is their Holy Book(s) themselves. It's their open ended nation, their contradictions, their literal support for condemnable things etc. Others read the book literaly, others, like you, metaphorically. No one can say which way is right but the fundamentalists have their book on their side while the liberal readers have only excuses and interpretations.

    The root of the problem IS the Quran (and the Hadith)

  26. db0 says:

    "Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too?" – Douglas Adams

  27. lu pikir la seniri says:

    hmm..
    i see..
    so you say the problem is Quran and Hadith..
    hmm..tell me
    how did the scientists discovered all the theories and all?
    i mean..did they just got the answers regarding what is happening around us straight away
    if Issac Newton was a literaly person, he probably wont be able to
    discover whats behind the fall of the apple from the tree would it?
    even poem made by shakespeare also required a person to read between the lines so
    that we get the exact meaning
    if not, we would misunderstood of what he was saying
    thats what our brains are for…to think.
    even in our daily life, we will encounter such condition.let say;
    if we want to aknowledge a person for he had done something wrong
    but we do not want to hurts his feelings,
    so we will arrange sentences that may not be straight forward but he will be able to get the meaning
    but if he does not, thats what require us to ask if we do not understand something

  28. lu pikir la seniri says:

    sometimes, human beings often speak more than their understanding
    they know only the small part,but talk as if they are well versed and know all
    the most pity part, they are 'trying to straightened a wet thread'
    (trying to straightened a wet thread is to step up with something that is wrong which he tought is right)

  29. Anath says:

    Of course I wonder. That is why I subscribe to science journals and read philosophy. The answers I have found thus far have pointed AWAY from religion, not toward it.

  30. Anath says:

    "how did the scientists discovered all the theories and all?
    i mean..did they just got the answers regarding what is happening around us straight away
    if Issac Newton was a literaly person, he probably wont be able to
    discover whats behind the fall of the apple from the tree would it? "

    No. Scientists performed rigorous experimentation through observation of the natural world and natural phenomena in order to reach the current level of knowledge. There was no "divine revelation" and little subjective interpretation. There is a degree of intuition, but science does not stand on intuition alone. Facts and figures are not about creative interpretation, as literature is.

  31. lu pikir la seniri says:

    'The answers I have found thus far have pointed AWAY from religion, not toward it. '

    the best word i would put here is 'secularism'.
    it is the separation of religious aspects from material aspects and
    its concerns on what is here and now..
    if you refer back to the history which i will just summarize it here,
    secular in other words means to separate from the state,
    but state at that time were under the govern of the church..
    the church can decide on anything,they have the authority,power
    people were to obey watever had been stated by the Church..
    but then, scientific movement began to came out
    to fight againts the church…
    the renaissance where the rebirth of knowledge occured..
    people started to discover things and take things (knowledge) seriously.
    but..the church did not approve of such matter
    for instance:
    according to the church
    they believe that the earth is the center
    but Galileo says the other way…
    thus, the church became the enemy of Science
    n Science is rejecting Church because it hinders to advance

  32. lu pikir la seniri says:

    this is where secular was born
    it divert from the other world thus concentrates on what is here and now
    which is why u found that it pointed AWAY from religion
    secularism is the tree, the branches connected to the tree are;
    sciencetific worldview, materialism, Freethinkers, globalisation, post-modernism,humanism
    what makes it all the same is
    -they do not include God and religious beliefs,'
    pointed it away,not toward it like u say
    thats why u wont find the answer in them in regards to religion

  33. lu pikir la seniri says:

    yes..for some people =)
    thats the way they enjoy it,so its ok then.
    people have their own ways yes?.
    but for me
    i would not only like to see a beautiful garden..
    but also admiring the Creator that create such beautiful flowers
    that grows in the garden..
    to show my appreciation towards Him..
    that i appreciates such creations
    just like the way im enjoying a delicious cake,
    and say thank you to my mother for baking it
    for i appreciate her afford of baking it for me.

  34. lu pikir la seniri says:

    i have quoted this quotation by someone who is thus far
    knowlegeable from me in regards to Islam, Maulana Muhammad Abdul Aleem Siddiqui Al-Qaderi,famous islamic scholar and missionary
    during his historic conversation in 1935 with George Bernard Shaw, famous European playwright and intellectual
    'Although the translations of the Bible may attain
    the highest stage of perfection from the standpoint of language, one cannot say, under any circumstances, that they contain the original message of Christianity,or are the genuine versions of the teachings of Jesus Christ.you know the pure original message of the Gospel,as delivered by jesus,is no more extant.there is no original manuscript of the Gospel and numerous corruptions have produce numerous conflicting texts. and so confusion was worse confounded, and a seeker of thruth could not quench his thirst at its hydroid font…(continued in the next box)

  35. lu pikir la seniri says:

    the Quran in contrast,has been preserved in such a manner that there has not
    been the slightest change,not even to the extent of a letter or a dot. hence if we want to know the real teachings of christianity, we must look for them in the Quran'

    (in the book entitled George Bernard Shaw and the Islamic Scholar.text and commentary of their historic conversation in 1935
    pulished by Masjid Dar al-Quran, 1514 East Third Avenue. Bayshore, New York 11706, commentary and editing by Imran N. Hosein)

  36. lu pikir la seniri says:

    continued…

    George Bernard Shaw: has there really been no alteration in the Quran? is it absolute preserved in its original form?did Prophet Muhammad know how to write, and his writing existence?

    Maulana Siddiqui:there is a complete and authentic record of each and every chapter,nay even of every verse,or might i say,every word of the Quran.immediately following the revelation of a verse to him the Prophet used to send for the specia scribes apponted for the purpose of recording it. when transcribed,he would ask them to recite what they had written and after listening to and testifying it would explain to them its meaning.
    the manuscript in the handwriting of one of the most honored and trusted among the scribes, Zaid bin Thabit, are preserved intact in the Archieves Of Constantinople and Medina. Todays, Quranic text is the exact copy of the original,and the copies of the Quran in the world today do not differ with each other even in point of a comma or a dash.

  37. LeaT says:

    Well, your texts are just an eyesore to me, it's very hard to get what you are saying but heads up, keep trying. Nothing wrong with it. You might want to attend some lessons where people can properly teach you though, I think you might need that.

    I am sorry of I assumed you to be a troll, it's just that we got a lot of those people here, they come, assume they are faithful, try to get an angry response from us, leave. Seen it all too often, it's hard to see whether they are genuine or not. Most often they use our responses as a proof of our "satanistic" leanings and others silly conclusions they have about antichristians and nonbelievers.

  38. jorrizza says:

    But whether a fairytale has been edited or not in the last couple of thousand years doesn't automatically make it the truth. Besides, the actual text has never really been a problem at all. It's the difference in interpretation of it that causes problems.

  39. lu pikir la seniri says:

    'Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too?" – Douglas Adams '

    its more than fairies my friend,
    its like;
    yes,i see a beautiful garden, how lucky to have such garden, but its ok, at least i have a pot of flowers, for there are some people who not only never witness the beauty of a garden let alone to have a pot of flowers.

    would it be happier if everyone get to see that a garden is beautiful and dicover that there are not only fairies at the bottom of it

  40. lu pikir la seniri says:

    well,what we are talking right now its not a fantasy fairytale my friend,
    for those who does not believe in it, it may appear as fairytales to them.

    jorrizza:Besides, the actual text has never really been a problem at all. It's the difference in interpretation of it that causes problems.

    true,the more views,the more confusion.
    the difference in interpretation that is not according to the actual form that causes the problem.
    thats why we must go back to the originallity form.
    and interpretation must have evidence that come from the originality form.

  41. lu pikir la seniri says:

    yes,i agree, i do need to improve myself.

    and please, dont get me wrong,
    i respect your belief, and i hope u respect mine too.
    please dont get me wrong,
    i have no intention of condemming you or your friends,
    or in what u believe in, im sorry if i sound like one.
    i understand how you feel, cause thats how i felt when i read the article (the first article that makes me posted my comment ) which for me, its not true,
    but perhaps for you and your friends believe
    its true.
    so i guess, everyone wants to stand up and protect their stand.
    im sorry if my texts are an eyesore to you, cause
    its just one of my way of protecting in what i believe in.
    cause i love my religion, so its normal for protecting someone you love right.
    again, im sorry for intruding and sound as if im critisizing
    your beliefs.all this while i am actually more on defending my religion,nothing harm to putting down your beliefs
    i respect in whatever you believe in.

    but thanx for spending your time reading my comment and
    give some critiques on it, ill take it positively.

  42. LeaT says:

    No, you misunderstand me. It is an eyesore because it's hard to read due to lack of grammar and proper spelling, not because of its actual CONTENT.

    As for the OP, we as ACP members might not necessarily agree with everything being said, even among ourselves ;) I think that db0 is maybe lumping together all Muslims here into a hasty generalization fallacy, of course, it is not supposed to be written in a form of politically or academically correct manner (as far as I am aware db0 knows better than to generalize groups of people), so what he said should be taken with a grain of salt. However, this is very hard for someone who doesn't know db0 and his writing style and I can understand why it upset you.

    I think only respect can stem out of respect.

  43. db0 says:

    I am not actually generalizing here. I'm more of condemning Muslims who adhere to a religion that promotes lying (among other things) and express what my position will be. Consider it like this, if you met someone who has a religion which promotes lying for ones own interests as the best attitude, would you trust this person? Would you trust this person if he tells you that yes, he still follows that religion but ignores the "lying" part?

  44. Anath says:

    And how would you know that he is telling the truth, and not lying about ignoring the lying part… because that is allowed as well…

  45. Truthteller says:

    Don’t mind being accused Muslims on this however whenever you are accusing somebody you need to come with clear evidence to proof your points. None of that have been found on this clip. If I am Anti-Christian and gather some people against Christian teachings to make a video. It would be naive to take it as a true. But if I open minded would do a lot of un-biased research on this topic and I hope you all do the same.

Leave a Reply