As for the OP, we as ACP members might not necessarily agree with everything being said, even among ourselves I think that db0 is maybe lumping together all Muslims here into a hasty generalization fallacy, of course, it is not supposed to be written in a form of politically or academically correct manner (as far as I am aware db0 knows better than to generalize groups of people), so what he said should be taken with a grain of salt. However, this is very hard for someone who doesn't know db0 and his writing style and I can understand why it upset you.

I think only respect can stem out of respect.

and please, dont get me wrong,
i respect your belief, and i hope u respect mine too.
please dont get me wrong,
i have no intention of condemming you or your friends,
or in what u believe in, im sorry if i sound like one.
i understand how you feel, cause thats how i felt when i read the article (the first article that makes me posted my comment ) which for me, its not true,
but perhaps for you and your friends believe
its true.
so i guess, everyone wants to stand up and protect their stand.
im sorry if my texts are an eyesore to you, cause
its just one of my way of protecting in what i believe in.
cause i love my religion, so its normal for protecting someone you love right.
again, im sorry for intruding and sound as if im critisizing
your beliefs.all this while i am actually more on defending my religion,nothing harm to putting down your beliefs
i respect in whatever you believe in.

but thanx for spending your time reading my comment and
give some critiques on it, ill take it positively.

jorrizza:Besides, the actual text has never really been a problem at all. It's the difference in interpretation of it that causes problems.

true,the more views,the more confusion.
the difference in interpretation that is not according to the actual form that causes the problem.
thats why we must go back to the originallity form.
and interpretation must have evidence that come from the originality form.

its more than fairies my friend,
its like;
yes,i see a beautiful garden, how lucky to have such garden, but its ok, at least i have a pot of flowers, for there are some people who not only never witness the beauty of a garden let alone to have a pot of flowers.

would it be happier if everyone get to see that a garden is beautiful and dicover that there are not only fairies at the bottom of it

I am sorry of I assumed you to be a troll, it's just that we got a lot of those people here, they come, assume they are faithful, try to get an angry response from us, leave. Seen it all too often, it's hard to see whether they are genuine or not. Most often they use our responses as a proof of our "satanistic" leanings and others silly conclusions they have about antichristians and nonbelievers.

George Bernard Shaw: has there really been no alteration in the Quran? is it absolute preserved in its original form?did Prophet Muhammad know how to write, and his writing existence?

Maulana Siddiqui:there is a complete and authentic record of each and every chapter,nay even of every verse,or might i say,every word of the Quran.immediately following the revelation of a verse to him the Prophet used to send for the specia scribes apponted for the purpose of recording it. when transcribed,he would ask them to recite what they had written and after listening to and testifying it would explain to them its meaning.
the manuscript in the handwriting of one of the most honored and trusted among the scribes, Zaid bin Thabit, are preserved intact in the Archieves Of Constantinople and Medina. Todays, Quranic text is the exact copy of the original,and the copies of the Quran in the world today do not differ with each other even in point of a comma or a dash.

(in the book entitled George Bernard Shaw and the Islamic Scholar.text and commentary of their historic conversation in 1935
pulished by Masjid Dar al-Quran, 1514 East Third Avenue. Bayshore, New York 11706, commentary and editing by Imran N. Hosein)