Well dumbass, can you also be a little more specific, and mention that it was the very ideology that YOU represent and stand for, the liberalism and Marxism, that has been responsible for the perpetuation and creation of the very conditions that HAVE enabled these abysmal low Swedish (and other native, white European as well) birth rate in the first place? Who else, but the Godless and immoral self-loathing European leftists, have created and popularized hostile attitudes towards having large families (amongst native Europeans), and have turned abortion of white babies into a form of a casual contraceptive? Because I know that nothing makes a European liberal roll their eyes and cringe than a white couple with 19 children =)
http://www.divafabulosa.com/wp-content/uploads/20…

"I honestly don't agree with you. SD got horrible values and are terribly conservative in all areas. They prefer the nuclear family with women staying home and men working"

Well, this is certainly what the Third Worlders believe in. No wonder why non-European nations' populations are skyrocketing. Maybe you can try and lecture the Arab and African men why it's not right for them to have their own women barefoot and pregnant all the time, even though they've already given birth to 10 kids each?

You see, the problem isn't migration per se, nor the amount of asylum seekers. The amount of migrants Sweden received over the past years have drastically decreased. The problem is that migrants find it very hard to make a living and not everyone can start their own pizza restaurant or run their own shop. Furthermore, migrants are dumped to live in the same areas with very poor living space and poor social security. The problem is ergo how the government deals with migration – i.e. people become unhappy with their life situation and that's when it goes bad.

Add to the general media attention only focusing on "migration gone bad", and people will automatically get a flawed perception. What about all those migrants who work very hard for their citizenship and really pull their weight? We never heard about those stories, only those who fail because media never pays attention to when things actually work since that is the norm – it is expected to work.

Lastly, I'm not a nationalist, I don't believe in nor support nationalist values. I find the whole idea of a national Sweden pointless because Sweden is already so culturally diverse even if you remove all migrants from outside Europe that saying that something is typically Swedish becomes kind of pointless – because you are doing just that, stereotyping. Swedish families celebrate Christmas their own ways, not all celebrate Easter and so on. Nationalism only works if you believe in and support those values presented but it's just a general blindfold to create a sense of unity with the state. What says that a Muslim cannot support Swedish values? Many Muslims find for example Midsummer celebrations very exotic because it's so different from anything they experienced (and honestly, how silly can it not be when grown men and women jump around the maypole singing "Små grodorna"?).

Too bad they focus too much on the immigration point and not the other things they stand for.
If what I heard is true, then what they want is to lower the number of immigration and make those who come into Sweden feel more Swedish. Of course this could be propaganda and I'm glad I noticed before it was too late. But I hope that they just lower the number and don't cast them out. I think that they have a very good ideology, but they need to lower their focus on just Muslims, all though that is why they get votes.

as it is acceptable in their culture to treat women like insects.

Source, please? On the contrary, in such a traditional Muslim society as the Bedouin society, it is not considered acceptable to beat or rape women, as it not considered an honorful action.

Sweden does not nor ever has needed immigrants.

Wrong again. Due to Sweden's demographics with a high strata of highly educated people who are not willing to take trash jobs and low birth rate, labor immigration is very important to keep the society going.

The fact is, is that 76% of all muslim and african immigrants are on social benefit,

Source, please? And I want to see a report or similar from Socialstyrelsen.

A low birth rate can also be combated through financial incentives. For example maybe a 100k sek bonus for the third child as well as a lower tax rate and taxing the childless.

Your statmenet is ridiculous. Some people are for example unable to have children on their own, should they be taxed? Some people have children but are unable to care for them, should they still receive tax money? Furthermore, your tax system doesn't solve your claims about the "high" costs of unemployed migrants since you replace one high-cost system with another.

Also, did you ever consider that this tax system would equally benefit Muslims who have achieved Swedish citizenship? No, of course you didn't.

Otherwise in 20 years ethnic Swedes will become a minority in 20 years and be forced to live under sharia law

'
Define an ethnic Swede.

Before immigration there was very little crime in Sweden now the amount of rape is comparable to some african countries.

lol, "before" immigration? If you didn't know, the Swedish state is literarily built by immigration. Dutch, Germans, Irish, English, Finns and Norwegians have all travelled to Sweden and helped build Sweden as it is today. Don't be a fool.

In fact the amount of rape in Sweden is 6x the European average, this was not the case before large scale non western immigration.

Source? Also, consider that people may be better at reporting rape today than 30 years ago with it was considered more of a social stigma. This will make it look like there is an increase in the rape rate even though there is not, just that the rate of reports have increased.

How is Sweden better off now than it was when it was a homogenous nation?

Sorry to break your bubble, but again, Sweden has never been as homogenous as you'd like to think. Or did you forget about the Sami, the Jews and the Gypsies among other minority groups?

For me, the most ideal and utopian solution is to change our financial system. The problem isn't so much whether a nation-state can financially sustain itself, the problem is that our financial system to begin with is faulty. In hunter-gatherer societies no one is bothered over whether they will become bankrupt, because there is no economy to talk about more than the possible trade between other tribes. Even then, what they do trade is not general-purpose money, but they might sell their knives for someone's pig. And the societies are completely self-sustained, and there is usually never any serious lack of food, even during times when food is scarce.

By the way, socialism does not necessarily lead to fascism. Communism is not fascism, I am sure db0 can tell you plenty about the difference between Marxism, communism and the fake communism that we see in North Korea. Just because some communist regimes call themselves communist it does not necessarily make them communist. They are all fascist under the guise of communism.

I do not agree with the European Union (I feel a lot of decisions are taken just to be enforced upon the member states regardless of their actual individual positions on the matter, just look at FRA and a lot of the laws are very questionable when it comes to for example animal rights, ecological issues and health), and well… If you are a pacifist like me, the existence of NATO is just asking for troubles. I am not denying the need for an army, but an army should not be the first option when there is a world conflict.

-They will be so many people living from welfare that it will be unsustainable.
-Because the Swedes will vote to don´t pay higher taxes if they see that as a group they don´t get something in return and they are given to foreigners.

If the Swedish or world capital elites wanted you to remove the welfate system and place a neoliberal or whatever predating capitalist scheme in your country how do you think that they would convince you to do that? making the welfare unsustainible of course, from a foreigner point of view is what I´m thinking, why is all that improductive people living of wellfare allowed by the goverenment? why they still bring more if they haven´t a job for them? why an inmigrant is still receieving welfare after refusing to give his hand to a woman in a job interview? why all the media did publish that new? was to make angry the Swedish taxpayer and create opinion against having a welfare system?

With no doubt for me it was so shocking that you the Swedes give as much without asking something in return (almost all of my Hogskolespåret friends are living from welfare except me and a few more that we live from our savings), it´s good to help, OK, but don´t be foolish, I´ve been young and thought in that way, the world is marvelous, we all should be friends but if one work hard and have have his benefits/savings he can´t share with the lazy because sooner than later he will run in debt, they should be some limits.

I´ve seen this in Spain, politically correct media said that inmigrants they came because we need it, they shown statistics showing that it was a newborn hole in the graph for some ages and uncontrolled inmigration was supposed to help to pay the pensions, what we had was worker rights cutoff, strong dumping in low qualification jobs and when the housing bubble did explote an official growing 20% unemployment rate, unnoficial one claims to be higher. It was not the inmigrants fault, of course, they were people that came to improve their situation, it was our politicians fault to don´t prevent that (actually they were aligned with, promoting and denying the housing bubble but that gives for pages), now loads of our inmigrants are unemployed because they were doing low-qualified jobs, the state is sustaining the welfare people via a dramatic increase of the National Debt, very good for the predating banking system, very bad for the average Spanish.

So take care with political parties that like the current fiduciary banking system that needs to create an exponetial debt curve to be maintained, take care with the Euro (in Spain was catastrophic) and to join the NATO.

I still want to see a democratic party (not radical comunist) that is against the fiduciary money scheme and the control of private owned corporations (banks) over a national currency, until then for me what we have is a George Orwell´s 1984 like scheme, correct thinking programming since you are child, controlled and private owned media all different opinions but INSIDE some limits and dumb society that blames the inmigrants when they should blame their leaders.

Get your heads out of your arses and look around you, Swedish government has fucked up for 30 years when it comes to integration and supporting foreigners. That's why things look the way they do today. It's like saying to a Muslim: "Can you take off your shoes in my house? I don't want it to get dirty." to which the Muslim replies "No, in my house – I can walk around with my shoes all I want. Allah is not bothered."

WELL ALLAH DOESNT FUCKING LIVE IN SWEDEN, YOU COME HERE – YOU RESPECT OUR TRADITIONS AND BLEND IN.

What Muslims have done now is to merge with a highway going 30. You have to adapt your speed in order to fit in and keep the country running. Sadly, ours stopped growing in the 70's. The only thing we have now is Köttbullar and Spotify.

Thank fuck I live in California now.